Sue Bolton at anti-Wilders protest

Ten "blogs" were published simultaneously on Saturday 15 June 2013, regardless of what date Google "Blogger" gives them.  Google indiscriminately changed dates on some, but not others, when they were edited for minor corrections. And, as I required all of these blogs to appear in a certain order I "re-edited" all of them so that they would appear in the order I wanted… though Blogger re-dated some, but not others.


The Left and pro-"Palestine" groups combine to condemn criticism of Islamic doctrine and the critic of doctrine to be motivated by "racism". Criticism of Islam is equated, bizarrely, with "pro-Zionism".

In early 2013 Geert Wilders visited Australia to lecture on Islam. As a result protests were organised by the Students for Palestine. Protesters equated criticism of Islam with Palestinians; with the claim being made that criticism of Islam is racist. Sue Bolton, a socialist councillor, joined in the protest.

In a video posted on Youtube made by the Green Left, Socialist Councillor Sue Bolton is protesting outside the venue where Geert Wilders was due to speak about Islam.

Bolton bundles together a number of unrelated issues and protests over them; she equates the "working class" with a protest that is meant to be about racism because criticism of the religious doctrine of Islam, a religion, is claimed to constitute criticism of "race".

The video includes placards that proclaim that criticism of Islam is racist. 

Very near the end Bolton starts the chant "Racism no way, we're gonna fight it all the way".

This chant is taken up by another of the protestors on a megaphone and the crowd then chants the same message. The camera pans past former Yarra councillors/candidates Anthony Main and Mel Gregson, as well as past Alex Sproule.

This point is relevant in our situation:

Wilders criticises Islam by quoting Islamic doctrine, the Koran, and for this, over a document that is of no race he is called "racist".

The Koran is not brown or white or black, it is a book, not a race. And followers of the precepts prescribed by the Koran are not prevented from either believing them or following them on condition that they have to satisfy some criterion of needing to be brown or white or black. That is, race is not a criterion for selection to be Muslim; the Koran is not a race. 

The protest against Wilders was organised by Students for Palestine organisation. That is, in a lecture in which the doctrinal elements of Islam are discussed, the issue of Palestine and Israel and "occupation" become the catalyst for the protest over Wilders. 

This happened to us during our exhibition Humanist Transhumanist in 2009 where the gallery owner, Robert Cripps, objected to criticism of Islam. He declared that criticism of Islam unfairly portrayed Muslims as the perpetrators of violence in Palestine, a topic that was not mentioned anywhere in the exhibition. Cripps' claim was that quotes from the Koran would cause a reader to blame Muslims for conflict in Palestine and not Jews (admitting that he hated Jews and that this was racist, and that he was a racist). And, to reiterate, the context of the criticism I made was with regards to religion and religious values versus values we arrive at by the application of our reason. My criticism was of Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, as well as Islam, and not just Islam. But only criticism of Islam was claimed to constitute "racism".

The objective of those who turn criticism of Islam into an issue of racism turns out to always be the same; such criticism intends to prevent knowledge of what the Koran (and the hadith) urge followers to do, which in Islam is a legal obligation, Sharia. If knowledge of the Koran or the hadith is suppressed, and the only religious text one is familiar with is the Bible, then, the source of violence will be sought in the Bible, specifically, the Old Testament. The objective to not having Islam criticised is to allow for only the Jews to be criticised. This is racist: such people hate Jews and only want to blame Jews and call for the suppression of information that would expose the racism behind their stance.

With regards to Sue Bolton's protest in this instance, she champions her (her party's) stance against a Nazi bookshop that had opened in the electorate (or neighbouring electorate?) some time in the past. This she equates to her stand against Geert Wilders. 

However, the Nazis allied themselves to Islam and among the Nazis was al Husseini, an Arab Muslim. Arab-language Nazi radio used the passages of the Koran to incite hatred against the Jews, in the way that Hitler used biblical passages in his Mein Kampf, and in his speeches against Jews. Geert Wilders criticises the passages that I too criticise, and both he and I are deemed “racist”, even though my criticising the Biblical basis of Hitler’s actions and beliefs is considered a deserved criticism of Judaism and Christianity.

Muslims and Nazi have a shared objective

Sue Bolton supports Muslims. However, Islam's cause is to commit genocide of the Jews. Bolton also campaigns against Nazis (in the form of a Nazi bookshop). However, the Nazis, like her, supported Muslims and their objectives.

Arab Muslim Nazi al Husseini, left, facing German Christian Nazi Hitler, right. Sue Bolton supports Muslims (followers of the doctrines of Islam), but at the same time does not support Nazis? 

Arab Muslim Nazi al Husseini, left, shaking hands with German Christian Nazi Himmler, right. Sue Bolton supports Muslims (followers of the doctrines of Islam), but at the same time does not support Nazis?

Sue Bolton supports Muslims (followers of the doctrines of Islam), but agitates against Nazis. The headline to the article above: "Nazism, Islam shared common enemies - the Jews".

Islam and Nazism share a common goal

"NEW YORK – A newly released report by the US National Archives details the close collaborative relationship between Nazi leaders and the grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, indicating that Nazi authorities planned to use Husseini as their leader after their conquest of Palestine." ( http://www.jpost.com/International/Nazism-Islam-shared-common-enemies-the-Jews ) 

Al Husseini is a Nazi war criminal who evaded prosecution at Nuremberg.

"The report, Hitler’s Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, US Intelligence and the Cold War, was prepared on the basis of thousands of documents declassified under the 1998 Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act." (The US report is free as a pdf. It is compelling reading. Yes, I printed it, saved a copy, and have read it.)

Sue Bolton was acting in concert with Students for Palestine (she is friends on Facebook with others associated with Students for Palestine). She supports the cause of “Palestinians”, but so too did Hitler, a Nazi… and she condemns Nazis. Hitler praised "Palestinians" for fighting "World Jewry"before the existence of Israel.

In 2009 I, an atheist critiquing Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Zoroastrianism was declared "racist" for critiquing Islam. The person who made this accusation claimed that it was "insensitive to Palestinians" and that it would make the Jews victims of Muslims, and he would rather believe it was otherwise. To date we have encountered various levels of incredulity to the notion that a critique of religion, in which Islam is but one of a number of religions critiqued, could de-evolve into a discussion about Jews in Palestine. After-all we don't mention this conflict anywhere. So, how, or for what purpose, and on what grounds could "Palestine" enter into any debate?

email author ophion at internode.on.net

No comments allowed? If you are passionate and want to comment, there is nothing that prevents you from writing your own blog. I have a disdain for the kind of commentary made by those who hide behind an avatar. 

Genocide incited by Australian Muslim's mufti. Call met with silence.

Ten "blogs" were published simultaneously on Saturday 15 June 2013, regardless of what date Google "Blogger" gives them.  Google indiscriminately changed dates on some, but not others, when they were edited for minor corrections. And, as I required all of these blogs to appear in a certain order I "re-edited" all of them so that they would appear in the order I wanted… though Blogger re-dated some, but not others.

Australian Mufti visits Hamas to praise the pursuit of genocide of Jews

Australia's Mufti, above, praises the Palestinian goal of committing the genocide of Jews. In Australia, the "Palestinian cause" is supported by groups such as Students for Palestine. Such university student groups were a feature of pre-Nazi Germany that led to Hitler's ideas being considered "respectable".

“Australia’s Mufti” visited Hamas in Gaza in December 2012 to praise the pursuit by Hamas of genocide of Jews and to learn from Hamas. Some years earlier, Australia's then prime minister Rudd was agitating to have Ahmadinejad charged for inciting war crimes when Ahmadinejad called for genocide in calling for the obliteration of the Jewish state (below).

The praise of the pursuit of genocide of the Jews by Australia's mufti was however met with silence in 2013. There was no condemnation from the Australian government or media. And, Australia's national government broadcaster, the ABC, deliberately deleted the references to the genocide hadith praised by Australia's mufti in its news report. 

Introduction; a brief summary of the Koran and hadith

Islam is the sum of the Koran and the hadith. 

The sum of the Koran and hadith is law: sharia. Any passage in the Koran is sharia.

Information on sharia is readily available. Above, a screenshot of the Wikipedia entry for sharia.

Above, the Mac dictionary entries for the terms referred to in the Wikipedia article. “Sharia” (law), “sunna” (constituent parts of Islamic law), and “hadith” (deeds of Mohammed). These entries are independent to the information available on the Wikipedia and are consistent with what appears on the Wikipedia.

This is also consistent with the definition of Islam by the official government-sanctioned Islamic Council body of the state of Victoria, Australia, as it appears on their website:

"The word "Islam" ... indicate[s] the "submission" or
'surrender" of oneself to God Almighty [Allah], being obedient to His
commands, ... [which are] Based on the messages of God Almighty [Koran], and the teachings and practices of
His prophet Muhammad [hadith]... A[ny] person who acts according to these or to similar descriptions is
called a "Muslim" (not an Islamist)."[the brackets are part of the ICV quote, not mine]

http://www.icv.org.au/icvdocs/generaloverviewofislam.pdf

According to to the Koran the Jews were given the Koran which they (and then Christians) corrupted, which made it necessary for god, on Mohammed's say-so, to send him with the Koran. 

"Allah made a covenant with the Israelites ... But because they broke their covenant We laid on them Our curse ...They have perverted the words of the Scriptures...You will find them deceitful except for a few of them ... " Koran, The Table 5.11-17 Dawood translation.

The Old Testament, that Mohammed claimed he came to correct was written/compiled in c.550 BC. Mohammed's Koran was compiled over 1,200 years later in c. 650 AD. 

Instead of the obvious, being that Mohammed garbled the tales he claimed were from the Bible, Muslims claim that the differences and historicity of the Bible only prove how long ago the Jews corrupted the word of god; how long Jews have been corrupt; and why god considered it absolutely necessary to send Mohammed to correct the corruptions introduced by Jews. 

The Koran states:

"We took a pledge from the Children of Israel, and sent messengers to them. Whenever a messenger brought them anything they did not like, they accused some of lying and put others to death..." Koran, The Feast, 5.70 (Haleem translation)

The government-sanctioned Islamic Council of Victoria, supports the claim that the Koran is the correction of corrupted scripture:

"The Quran is the holy book for Muslims, who believe it contains the word of God revealed to the prophet Muhammad. The Quran, or `recitation' was revealed over a period of 22 years. Muslims regard it as the direct word of God speaking in the first person. .. The Quran is a seal and purifier of all the previous scriptures.
It speaks of distortions that crept into earlier texts and gives the message that all prophets and messengers brought in a pure and unadulterated form.
The Prophet Muhammad is the seal of Prophets and is the last Messenger."

From the Islamic Council of Victoria website FAQs, http://www.icv.org.au/index.php/faqs

(According to the pdf metadata the "author" is Ramy Najmeddine and the document was created on Word 2010 on 13/10/2010. I saved a copy of this pdf some time prior March 2013. The page has since been removed by the ICV.)

Islam is genocidally anti-Jewish

As the state-sanctioned Islamic Council of Victoria proclaim, being obedient to the hadith is what defines one a "Muslim" and by observing the Koran and hadith does not make one an "Islamist". In the hadith  the call is made for the genocide of all Jews. Genocide, is the remedy to corruption of scripture, and "Judgement Day" is predicated on achieving this genocide. Attempting to commit the genocide of Jews is, according to the Islamic Council of Victoria, an act that is "Muslim and not "Islamist", as the Muslim is simply following scripture.

Above, one of the "Apocalyptic" genocide hadith that require the genocide of the Jews. Sahih Muslim, Book 41, number 6983, “Turmoil And Portents Of The Last Hour... Allah's Messenger ...[said]: You and the Jews would fight against one another until a stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.” The hadith are readily available and easily accessed. Muslims need not be “radicalised” by accessing jihadist websites; all that is needed is access to the Koran and the hadith, and government sanctioned bodies such as the Islamic Council of Victoria that praise the Koran and hadith as being "perfect" because they are "divine", and therefore superior to the "temporary" "human-made" and therefore  "imperfect" laws of non-Muslims. The ICV defines Muslims as those who faithfully observe the edicts of Islamic scripture, being the Koran and hadith, and decries the description of such person as "Islamist".

The raison d' etre of Islam is to commit complete genocide of Jews. On that day of the genocide of the Jews, Muslims have it (the hadith) that their god Allah will raise the dead to judge them. According to Islam, judgement day will not occur until the last Jew is killed.

Genocide is a Crime Against Humanity.

UN Resolution 260 of 9 December 1948 for the "Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide" makes any call or incitement to commit genocide a criminal offence. 

"

Adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.

ARTICLE III
The following acts shall be punishable:

• (a) Genocide;

• (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

• (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

• (d) Attempt to commit genocide;

• (e) Complicity in genocide.

ARTICLE VII
Genocide and the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall not be considered as political crimes for the purpose of extradition.
The Contracting Parties pledge themselves in such cases to grant extradition in accordance with their laws and treaties in force."

The resolution is unequivocal; inciting the public to commit genocide is a crime; and unlike other crimes, the inciting to commit genocide or the committing of genocide is not affected by extradition laws that might be used to prevent prosecution.

---

Australi's Mufti

In December 2012 the "Mufti of Australia" visited "Palestine", in Gaza, where, as he states, he sought to learn about martyrdom. Most alarming was that he, and all Muslims (I would guess) would compel the stones and trees talk. As the trees and the stones in the hadith call to announce a Jew hiding behind them, this IS a call to bring about the genocide.

"AUSTRALIA'S Grand Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohamed has met with the hierarchy of Hamas.

Last week Dr Mohamed led an Australian delegation of Muslim scholars to the Gaza Strip, where they met Hamas senior political leader Ismail Haniyeh…. [who] last year described former al-Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden as 'a Muslim and Arabic warrior'.

[Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohamed] expressed his happiness at being in Gaza, describing it as the land of pride and martyrdom.

'I am pleased to stand on the land of jihad to learn from its sons and I have the honour to be among the people of Gaza where the weakness always becomes strength, the few becomes many and the humiliation turns into pride… We came here in order to learn from Gaza. As I said in my speech, we will make the stones, trees, and people of Gaza talk, in order to learn steadfastness, sacrifice, and the defence of one's rights from them.'"

This is a proclamation of support for Hamas' endeavour to commit genocide of the Jews, an encouragement to incite others to commit genocide. Australia's national broadcaster deleted the references to the "stones and trees" in its reports.

The call made by Australia's Mufti follows an historical chain of transmission.

The references to the "stones and the trees" are those that appear in the hadith and date to c.850 AD (cited earlier).

The hadith cited is part of the Hamas covenant, with Hamas being the elected government of Gaza. Ibrahim Abu Mohamed is supporting Hamas' pursuit of genocide, and has gone to Gaza to learn from their example.

Hamas Covenant Article 7:

The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said:

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

The other reference to the "martyrs", "jihad" etc, can be traced to the famous Arab Muslim Nazi al Husseini, the Mufti of Palestine. Al Husseini, in a Nazi Arab-language radio broadcast during WW2 from Bari, implored: 

"Oh Arabs, use and avenge your martyrs. Avenge your honor. Fight for your independence. I, Mufti of Palestine, declare this a holy war against the British yoke of injustice, indecency… fear not death…." (quoted p. 59, Morse, The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism)

Al Husseini's WW2 sentiments were repeated in the 1964 Palestinian National Charter (PLO charter) introduction:

"the Palestinian Arab people, [have] waged fierce and continuous battles to safeguard its homeland, to defend its dignity and honor, … of immortal martyrs… We, the Palestinian Arab people, who believe in its Arabism and in its right to regain its homeland, to realize its freedom and dignity… continue its struggle and to move forward on the path of holy war (al-jihad) until complete and final victory has been attained…"

In pursuit of the aim of a religiously driven genocide Hamas launched a concerted rocket attack against unarmed Jewish civilians in Israel in 2008-2009. Hamas' actions were declared a War Crime by Human Rights Watch.

As Hamas controls 

1) whether or not rockets are fired at Jewish civilians;

2) and Hamas controls where they are fired from;

3) and that Hamas had a choice of where it would launch its rockets and deliberately chose densely populated civilian centres;

4) and Hamas knows its missiles cannot be guided, and that they will injure or kill civilians;

5) and as Hamas representatives have in the past declared that they deliberately aim at all Jews, on account of their simply being Jews indiscriminately;

that Hamas are knowingly targeting civilians which is a War Crime. Human Rights Watch in August 2009 condemned Hamas for their War Crimes and in their report also explained that the idea that the excuse that Hamas are attempting to correct a military disparity that exists between themselves and Israel does not justify Hamas' targeting of civilians. There is no justification under Crimes of War to target civilians for such a purpose.

It is not a defence to commit War Crimes because they are committed against Jews. The Human Rights Watch report can be found here: Gaza/Israel: Hamas Rocket Attacks on Civilians Unlawful | Human Rights Watch

However, by turning the doctrines of religion into a "protected attribute" ANY critic of the doctrinal basis of Islamic crimes that exposes the doctrinal basis for the committing of hate-crimes by Muslims is denounced as "racist". 

And, as Hamas' Covenant is unambiguous in stating its aims, and objectives as religious and based on the Koran, the critic is defamed as "racist" so that the Islamic element is left buried, so that the Jews instead can be blamed:

Hamas Covenant 1988 

The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement 

18 August 1988 

In The Name Of The Most Merciful Allah 

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" 

Article One: 

The Islamic Resistance Movement: The Movement's programme is Islam. 

Article Two: 

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the... complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam. 

Article Five: 

… adopting Islam as its way of life,… Allah is its target, the Prophet is its example and the Koran is its constitution.

Article Eight: 

Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes. 

Article Fifteen:

It is necessary to instill in the minds of the Moslem generations that the Palestinian problem is a religious problem.

The Education of the Generations: 

Article Sixteen: 

It is necessary to follow Islamic orientation in educating the Islamic generations in our region by teaching the religious duties, comprehensive study of the Koran, 

"Palestinians" can wage a religious war of attempted genocide of Jews, with impunity as the doctrinal basis for this war are made exempt from being referred to.

As recently as when I wrote this in 2013 Hamas has refused the right of any Jew to exist as was reported on Reuters (see below) 

---

And in 2011, the "other" "moderate Palestinian" body declared their intended objective to be that "Palestine"becomes the first state since Nazi Germany to make itself Judenfrei and Judenrein, as was reported on USAToday (see below).

The call for the genocide of Jews predates the creation of a Jewish state in "Palestine". 

Hitler praised the Muslim Arab Palestinian's hatred of Jews and saw it as worthy of emulation before a Jewish state ever existed, and more importantly, before the British created the Mandate of Palestine", when the country being attacked was Ottoman Turkey (see below)

So, who's the real racist? those who want to commit the genocide of the Jews? or the critics who denounce those who urge genocide of the Jews and who can point to the Islamic doctrinal basis that demands genocide? And why does the left so desperately seek to keep suppressed knowledge of Islamic doctrine by calling racist those who cite it? unless, of course, it is so that they can blame the Jews simply because they are racists.

email author ophion at internode.on.net

No comments allowed? If you are passionate and want to comment, there is nothing that prevents you from writing your own blog. I have a disdain for the kind of commentary made by those who hide behind an avatar.